Friday, July 4, 2008

On the Golden Rule and Matthew 18

(Kenny)

A proposal: what if the Golden Rule ("Do unto others as you would have them do unto you") is really at bottom the same thing as, "Treat other people the way you want God to treat you" -- and what if Jesus gave us the Golden Rule because He knows that God does, in point of fact, decide how to treat us based on how we treat other people?

When you think about it, there's a lot of Scripture that seems to imply that God takes His cue on how to treat us, from the way we treat other people. The parable of the sheep and the goats, for example, tends to be a source of distress to redneck Southern Baptists who want to fit everything into a simple Salvation by Faith Alone model, because the eternal fate of the nations is, according to Jesus, a matter entirely of what people did, not a matter of the profession of faith. In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus famously says:

"Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?' Then I will tell them plainly, 'I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!' (Matt. 7:21-23, NIV)


In the parable of the sheep and the goats, Jesus expands on what he means by "doing the will of my Father who is in heaven" -- and it seems (in that parable) to have everything to do with how we treated others:

"When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit on his throne in heavenly glory. All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate the people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left.

"Then the King will say to those on his right, 'Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.'

"Then the righteous will answer him, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?'

"The King will reply, 'I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.'

"Then he will say to those on his left, 'Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.'

"They also will answer, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?'

"He will reply, 'I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.'

"Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life." (Matt. 25:31-46, NIV)


And the Tanach weighs in as well: for example, "A generous man will prosper; he who refreshes others will himself be refreshed [Proverbs 11:25, NIV]," or, "Do not take advantage of a widow or an orphan. If you do and they cry out to me, I will certainly hear their cry. My anger will be aroused, and I will kill you with the sword; your wives will become widows and your children fatherless [Exodus 22:22-24, NIV]."

So, if God treats us the way we treat other people, then that raises two obvious questions:

1. What happened to justification by grace rather than works?

2. Given the fact that even the best of us frequently treat other people like jerks, doesn't "you get what you give out" pretty much mean we're all hosed?

But as it turns out, the answer to the second question, is precisely justification not by works, but by grace set free by works -- once we understand one of the most critical insights of Christianity.

God is going to treat us like we treat other people. But we frequently are jerks to other people. But that doesn't mean we're completely hosed, not yet at least. What it means is that God now has on his hands Kenny, who has been acting like a jerk; and He intends to treat me like I treat other people. So that makes the following question absolutely critical:

How does Kenny treat other people when they act like jerks?

You see what I mean? Since we frequently act like jerks, and since God looks at our own behavior to others to establish the rules by which He treats us, the most important thing about how we treat other people is precisely how we behave to the jerks. And once you get that insight, you'll see it throughout the teachings of Jesus. For example, the Sermon on the Mount:

"You have heard that it was said, 'Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.' But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.

"You have heard that it was said, 'Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.' But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be sons of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your brothers, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.


It isn't Jesus' main point, but still, doesn't it come through very clearly that being nice to the people who are nice to us just doesn't buy us much -- it's how we treat the jerks that matters? And this is just one example of the way in which this basic principle underlies so much of Jesus' teaching, even when it isn't His main point.

But there are at least two places in which it is, in fact, His main point, two places in which He leaves no room for confusion on the point. Here is the parable of the unforgiving servant, from Matthew 18 (my reading of which, this morning, kicked off this whole post):

Then Peter came to Jesus and asked, "Lord, how many times shall I forgive my brother when he sins against me? Up to seven times?"

Jesus answered, "I tell you, not seven times, but seventy-seven times.

"Therefore, the kingdom of heaven is like a king who wanted to settle accounts with his servants. As he began the settlement, a man who owed him ten thousand talents was brought to him. Since he was not able to pay, the master ordered that he and his wife and his children and all that he had be sold to repay the debt.

"The servant fell on his knees before him. 'Be patient with me,' he begged, 'and I will pay back everything.' The servant's master took pity on him, canceled the debt and let him go.

"But when that servant went out, he found one of his fellow servants who owed him a hundred denarii. He grabbed him and began to choke him. 'Pay back what you owe me!' he demanded.

"His fellow servant fell to his knees and begged him, 'Be patient with me, and I will pay you back.'

"But he refused. Instead, he went off and had the man thrown into prison until he could pay the debt. When the other servants saw what had happened, they were greatly distressed and went and told their master everything that had happened.

"Then the master called the servant in. 'You wicked servant,' he said, 'I canceled all that debt of yours because you begged me to. Shouldn't you have had mercy on your fellow servant just as I had on you?' In anger his master turned him over to the jailers to be tortured, until he should pay back all he owed.

"This is how my heavenly Father will treat each of you unless you forgive your brother from your heart."


He couldn't possibly have made it plainer, could He?

And that brings us to my final passage for this morning. When Jesus' disciples asked Him to teach them to pray, He put smack into the middle of the Lord's Prayer one of the most fearsome sentences ever uttered by human lips, a sentence that I hear people repeat by rote every Sunday morning:

"And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us."

Every person who repeats the Lord's Prayer, of his own free will asks God to bind him to the rule that God will do to us as we do unto others. How does one say those words without fear and trembling? -- unless we really can look at our hearts and be confident that we hold no grudges or enmity against any of those who have wronged us. How many of us can really stand that examination? Ought we not see to it that one of the main businesses of our lives, is the rooting out in us of all resentments and all grudges, and the granting of peace and grace to all those who have wronged us, no matter how badly?

Thus the argument about grace and works turns out, as such arguments almost always do, to turn in the end on a false dichotomy, or at least to turn on life at the periphery of our relationship with God rather than on life at the deepest core. There is a place where the distinction between grace and works breaks down, at place at the very center of our life in Christ, a place where our works and God's grace meet and kiss each other. We are saved by grace, not by our works -- except that there is one of our works that is, actually, a precondition for grace: namely, our own granting of grace to others. There is one "work" that plays a direct role in our salvation, albeit even then in the role of a necessary precondition, not a sufficient agent.

And that "work" -- is grace.

Thursday, July 3, 2008

The Valley of Vision

(Kenny)

My friend Butch sent me a Puritan meditation early this morning. I'm not sure Butch realizes that "contriti corde" is Latin for, roughly, "those whose hearts have been broken," though if he noticed the URL for this blog when he followed the link...well, that's a pretty big hint, dontcha think? ;-)

At any rate, R.I. and I each are, in our own ways, going through some bleak and emotionally exhausting times of externally imposed trial, taking our places in the fellowship of suffering that God's called and Chosen have through the centuries perforce known so intimately. Hence our daily prayer for each other; hence the name of this blog. And this meditation speaks exactly to where I, at least, am at the moment.

By the way, I believe it was St. Teresa of Avila who has the distinction of being perhaps the sole person ever to have bested God in repartee. I don't remember what bit of bad luck she had suffered, but it was one of that moments that every Christian has periodically when you suspect that God's going out of His way to make things more difficult than they need to be. St. Teresa, who was nothing if not outspoken, asked God bluntly, "Lord, why are you treating me like this?"

"Teresa," the Lord answered, "that's how I treat all my friends."

She fired right back. "Pues, por eso tienes tan pocos..." -- "Well, that explains why you have so few of 'em."

Here's the Puritan mediation "The Valley of Vision," which you can find in this collection (which, I might add, comes highly recommended by Butch).

Lord, high and holy, meek and lowly,

Thou hast brought me to the valley of vision,
where I live in the depths but see thee in the heights;
hemmed in by mountains of sin I behold thy glory.

Let me learn by paradox
that the way down is the way up,
that to be low is to be high,
that the broken heart is the healed heart,
that the contrite spirit is the rejoicing spirit,
that the repenting soul is the victorious soul,
that to have nothing is to possess all,
that to bear the cross is to wear the crown,
that to give is to receive,
that the valley is the place of vision.

Lord, in the daytime stars can be seen from deepest wells,
and the deeper the wells the brighter thy stars shine;

Let me find thy light in my darkness,
thy life in my death,
thy joy in my sorrow,
thy grace in my sin,
thy riches in my poverty
thy glory in my valley.

Wednesday, July 2, 2008

"Who gives generously to all without finding fault..." (repost from RedneckPeril)

(Kenny)

I originally posted this over at Redneck Peril back in September. Having had a few months to think it over, I might rewrite some of it a bit for reasons of style and clarity, but I think on the whole I still buy it.

I've been trying, throughout this divorce, to live out James 1:2 ("Consider it pure joy, my brothers, whenever you face trials of many kinds"), and a while back, while re-reading James, I learned something about giving, I think. I was thinking through James 1:5, in which we are told that God gives his gifts haplos kai me oneidizontos -- "generously and ungrudgingly" is how the RSV puts it. So I was thinking about that and meditating on what that looked like, and realized it doesn't look very much like how I was "generous" to some very difficult people in my past -- that is, I worked very hard to be generous and I made a ton of personal sacrifices that I didn't at all have to make, but the responses I consistently got posed a challenge to me that I didn't realize I was facing and didn't until tonight realize I had failed.

Haplos (NIV and RSV "generously," Bauer/Arndt/Gingrich "simply, sincerely, openly, generously, without reserve") is a word whose full connotation I think I can best sum up as, "without ulterior motives." I have recently been witness to a person ("Mr. M." for Manipulator) who had an agenda he could not accomplish without making use of somebody else ("Ms. N.", for Ms. Nice Gal, gender set to female for pronomial convenience in the next few sentences). Now, Mr. M. knew that Ms. N. would not approve of the agenda in the service of which he intended to use her, and he set about gaining her confidence, hoping to gain enough of her trust to win some sort of confidential information that he could use -- by betraying those very confidences, obviously -- against "Mr. T." -- that is, his true Target. Now the guy who pulled this stunt -- do you think that I will ever again, for the rest of my life, get a favor from this guy without wondering what he plans to use me for? Timeo Danaos et dona ferentis: I fear the Greeks even -- indeed especially -- when they come bringing gifts.

Furthermore, because there are people like that in the world, even a genuinely sincere person can be suspected: I personally know what it is to have every attempt you make to be nice to someone interpreted in the worst possible light because the person assumes you are, so to speak, a Greek giver; and the tragic thing about that was that the only thing the guy accomplished by "defending" himself against me, was to stymie every attempt I made to help him become successful -- in the job from which he was ultimately fired. (That may be specific enough for some of my longer-term acquaintances to figure out to whom I'm referring, in which case I apologize to the gentleman in question -- but I take consolation in the fact that I am 100% certain he will never read my blog and thus will never have his feelings hurt by what I have just said. Plus he's probably too bloody stupid even to realize that he's the one I'm talking about...no, no, just kidding, really and truly.) And I have slightly more recent experience as well with another person who responded to every attempt I made to be generous with resentment and with imputation of vicious motives, and who not only took my efforts in the worst possible light but who furthermore tried to use a highly distorted version of them as a way to paint me out to be a bad person -- and when in self-defense I stopped making generous gestures, he complained to mutual acquaintances that I was a selfish and grasping and greedy and tight-fisted person because I wasn't giving him any help. (As you perceive, I have had some wonderful co-workers and very nice friends at church but I have also seen my share of dysfunctional vocational and social communities -- when I laugh at "The Office," I, like most Americans who've put in a couple of decades in the workforce, have plenty of personal experience fueling the laughter.)

Well, God isn't a Danaean: His gifts can be trusted. Not necessarily trusted to be pleasant (sometimes His gifts have to be trusted the way a child has to trust his mother's gift of a dose of castor oil or his father's gift of a sound spanking), but trusted to be sincere and straightforward and genuinely meant for the good of the recipient, not as some form of manipulation.

Try thinking of it this way (you'll see why in a minute): when God offers you a gift, you can accept it freely without worrying that He's hypocritically covering up some fault. You can just say, "Thank you," with equal sincerity and openness. God isn't a Greek and His horses aren't Trojan, if you want to put it that way.

(It dawns on me -- rosy-fingered, as it were -- that I ought not be assuming that everybody reading this is familiar with the Homeric cycle and the Aeneid and the story of the Trojan horse. Wikipedia, guys, wikipedia.)

Me oneidizontos is the flip-side, and I think the best way to capture its meaning here is "without insults." I don't quite like the NIV's "generously...without finding fault," because I don't think its point is sharp enough, and the RSV's "ungrudgingly"...well, they certainly know more than I do but that's still just not how it strikes me at all. Do you know the kind of person from whom you just hate to receive gifts because his whole manner and attitude in giving you the gift is demeaning and belittling? -- but you feel like you have to put up with it because beggars can't stand on their dignity. Only, after you've been hit with that a couple of times you're apt to decide you'd rather go hungry than accept his "generosity." Do you know the kind of thing I'm talking about?

One thing I know about husbands -- I hope somehow my daughters learn this before they get married because if they don't learn it they will inevitably find themselves living out Proverbs 14:1 -- is that there are things that we husbands need that we emphatically don't deserve; but the fact that we don't deserve them doesn't at all change the fact that we desperately need them and that the consequences of our being denied them are catastrophic, especially for our wives. And I think something analogous is probably true of everybody in some sense, and indeed probably in too many senses for us to hope to count them. Certainly at the level of salvation we need from God grace that we do not deserve; but I think it is true emotionally as well -- our whole lives are, or ought to be, one long process of continually coming before God with our requests even though we are not worthy so much as to gather the crumbs under His table. And it occurs to me tonight that one of my very favorite collects from the Book of Common Prayer -- Proper 11 -- almost looks as though it had been written without due attention to what James is trying to tell us.

Proper 11 reads, in part (the emphasis is mine), "Have compassion on our weakness, and mercifully give us those things which for our unworthiness we dare not, and for our blindness we cannot ask." Now, the godly men who composed this prayer wisely knew that there are lots of times in our lives in which we are all too aware of how little we deserve, and because of our unworthiness we dare not ask God. But James is saying simply, "If there is ever any time in which there is something you need from God and you dare not ask Him because of your unworthiness, then you don't really know God -- if for your unworthiness you dare not ask, then that's your fault, not His."

God gives sincerely and generously, without ulterior motive or hidden selfish agenda; He is no Greek giver; you need not suspiciously try to find fault with Him. And you need not worry that when you go to Him asking for wisdom He will remind you of your shortcomings and sneer at your needs and in the end give you His gifts only while making sure you are made bitterly aware of how much better He is than you: He will not find fault with you.

So now the real question is: how does my giving, stack up against God's? And what I've realized tonight is something that sheds a lot of retrospective light on that old relationship I referred to earlier, in which every time I tried to be generous to the guy, he turned it into an excuse to claim I was a vicious and evil person. Well, looking back now, I finally perceive that there is one respect in which my generosity has been deficient, and when I dig into it more deeply I find that I was not quite giving haplos and I was not exactly giving oneidizontos. Close, but not quite. And the reason I know I wasn't, is that I used to get so angry whenever he took my attempts at generosity and peacemaking and tried to use them to further my destruction.

Interestingly, as time went on he got less and less willing to accept any generosity from me, and I have realized that it is because there was an agenda behind my giving and because I did find fault. The agenda was the making of peace, an aspect of which I habitually expect (as would most civilized people) to be a response of gratitude. And while I was careful not to find fault (even in my own mind) when I was going to special trouble to be helpful to him, still I could sit in a corner and cry, "Heigh, ho," for gratitude from him for those gestures -- and the lack of gratitude infuriated me, whereupon I would find fault...not with the fact that he needed help, but with his striking lack of gratitude whenever I tried to help him.

But that means that my gifts were not given freely -- they were given with the expectation of gratitude, and in (it would seem) the service of a private agenda on my part of obtaining gratitude and graciousness from the dude, and I resented his failure to go along with my agenda in giving the gifts.

So, um, my bad there, is what I'm saying. And the sad thing is that every generous gesture I made with my agenda of making peace, seemed to wind up doing nothing but worsen and further embitter the conflict...for I was not giving haplos kai me oneidizontos. And my basic reaction was pretty much, "Well if THAT'S what I'm gonna get for trying to help, why the hell am I bothering?"

Which turns out, actually, to be a very good question, and we'll return to it for the final wrap-up of this post; but my immediate point is that it didn't occur to me to ask, "What in the world did I do wrong in the way I went about trying to help, that caused it to do so much harm than good?" I spent a long time asking myself, "Why does that S.O.B. act that way?"...but it's only tonight that I finally stopped wondering, "Why did he always behave so badly?" and started wondering, "Is it possible that I was behaving badly myself?" And the answer is: yes, I was; I was not living out my responsibility to be an imitator of Christ with respect to James 1:5.

So, I'm thinking about all of this with my New Testament open in front of me, and I suddenly realize God is addressing, with me, the question of, "Is THAT what I get for trying to help?" At that point God was finally able to get through that six inches of bone that apparently surrounds my brain, something along these lines: "Kenny, because of the attitude that has underlain your 'generosity,' if [that guy] had reacted with gratitude and had reciprocated your generosity with generosity of his own, then verily, verily, I say unto you: you would have had your reward."

Every good and perfect gift, even when it appears to come from other people, is, James famously says in this same chapter, from God. What I have realized tonight is that it works the other direction, too: my gifts to other people -- or at least to those annoying and socially-self-destructive persons who respond to generosity in a manner apparently calculated to ensure that one never again makes the mistake of treating them generously -- will only be good and perfect gifts if, even when they appear to go to other people, they are in truth gifts I offer to God. For then, if the person responds with bitterness and betrayal and insults rather than with gratitude and graciousness and reciprocation...so what? It wasn't really his present anyway. Every good and perfect gift we receive is from God; but every good and perfect gift we give, we give to God. And thus we need never complain that the Recipient of our gifts receives them ungraciously.

I'll have to think about this some more because it's a new thought for me and I probably don't really have it exactly right yet. But I think I'm a lot closer to the right attitude than I was before I sat down this evening with James. And certainly it's true that if, when I cast my mind back over the backstabbings and spittings-in-the-face and slanderings I've gotten clobbered with in exchange for trying to be nice to people, I find that as long as I think about what God was doing for me in the middle of that, it's actually possible to consider it pure joy -- but the moment I shift my focus to what the Mr. M du jour was doing to me, the joy is gone and I'm instantly seething with fury. And that doesn't do anybody any good at all.

Persons who set me straight in the comments will find I am grateful for the correction.

Saturday, June 14, 2008

A post that wound up on the Peril instead of here

(Kenny)

Had a hard time deciding whether this post belonged here (because of the religious musings at the end) or over at the Peril, where it wound up because of the family reminiscenses. (That word doesn't look like it's spelled right but Rusty is bored and in a hurry to leave the coffee shop so I'm not going to take time to look it up.)

Friday, June 6, 2008

An incident on Good Friday

(Kenny)

This is a repost of an autobiographical piece from a couple of years ago, originally posted at Redneck Peril. Not an easy read, especially for me, even a couple of years later.


--------------

Good Friday and the code wasn’t working...or maybe the code was working but the data was bad. I couldn’t tell which for sure, or, rather, I knew how to go about figuring it out but I also knew it would take at least an hour. I’d already been at work two hours longer than I had planned, and everybody else was gone except the 24-hour power traders (because even on Good Friday and Easter and Christmas and New Year’s Eve people expect the lights to come on when they flip the switch). I had had enough. So I packed up the laptop, swung by the kitchen for a cup of hot chocolate (I’m trying to reduce my dependence on coffee) and hit the road.

Swung onto Highway 6 and then the light ahead of me changed. I stopped and shifted into neutral and took my foot off the clutch, and the cars lined up behind me. Then a thunderclap of sound like a bomb behind me, and another. I looked in the rearview mirror and saw the third car behind me explode forward with another crash, and then the second. No time to switch back into gear, nothing to do but hold on. I shifted my eyes to the face of the woman behind me as her eyes widened with horror staring in her own rearview mirror, and then her car jerked forward and her head snapped back and it was all in slow motion and I could see the death grip she had on her steering wheel and then her car ground to a halt. No impact. Her brakes had held perhaps six inches from my bumper.

I pulled off the road into the small parking lot there on my right. Jumped out, ran back to the car behind me. The woman was frantically asking the old lady in the passenger seat if she was all right; the lady in the passenger seat was having trouble breathing. I could hear a child screaming and then I saw his father running from the cars with his five-year-old son screaming in his arms; there was grass on the other side of the parking lot and the child’s mother trailed several feet behind them. I looked back at the old lady and she took a deep breath and said she was fine.

I had my phone out and was dialing 9-1-1. They wanted to know if anybody was hurt. I was walking up and down the scene; everybody seemed to be out of their cars and nobody was trapped, but the back three cars were absolutely mauled. I told them about the kid and they said they would send an ambulance. I looked at the car that had started it, a van of some sort. Grill smashed all the way back to the tires and bright red brake fluid all over the ground from the demolished car he’d hit and dirty black oil from his own engine and white steam rolling out from under what had been his hood but the old fool was trying to get his car started and drive away. Another, younger man standing and screaming at him to turn off his engine. Then he gets out and wobbles toward us, a fatuously ingratiating smile on his face and even my worthless nose could smell the alcohol ten feet away. Two women next to me, one says, “I knew he was about to hit somebody; he never even slowed down.” Other woman asks the world in general, looking at me, “He’s going to have to pay for all our cars, isn’t he?” “His insurance company will,” I answer. None of us says out loud that the kind of man who is driving a car down the highway reeking drunk at 4:30 on a Friday afternoon is the kind of man who doesn’t carry liability insurance. I don’t know if she has thought of that on her own but I see no point in adding to her present worries if she hasn’t.

Nobody will talk to him, his stupid smile makes you want to punch him and we can all hear the little boy still screaming over on the grass.

I go back to the old woman and her daughter. The daughter is out of the car pacing back and forth while she tries to get someone to answer her on the cell phone. “What street is this?” she asks and I tell her and she tells the person on the other end of the conversation. I look at the old lady, who is still breathing irregularly. “Ma’am,” I ask gently, “can I get you something to drink?” It is a very hot day. She answers gratefully, in a whisper, “Water.” “I’ll be right back.” There is a small corner store but it is across six lanes of traffic – only five lanes now though. I pick my way across, buy a bottle of water and six bottles of Gatorade, pick my way back across to where I started. The police haven’t gotten here yet, I don’t even hear sirens. I give her the water and she says, “Thank you, son.” I don’t get called “son” much any more except by my parents and I’m briefly amused.

I go from one little group to the other passing out the Gatorade. The little boy isn’t screaming anymore. I walk past the drunk sitting on the grass and come up to where the boy is lying on the ground, his mother squatting next to him on her haunches, the father standing tall beside them and gazing quietly across the lawn at the long line of twisted metal. They have gotten an icepack from someplace – a big freezer bag filled with convenience store ice; somebody must have had an icechest in the car – and they have laid it across the boy’s chest. His eyes are wide and terrified and uncomprehending but he is not crying and his parents have the look of people who are in the aftermath of adrenaline but who think everything is going to be okay. I offer them Gatorade; the father answers, “We don’t think it’s a good idea for him to drink anything yet.” I gently correct him, “I mean for you and your wife.” He thanks me and declines. I have two Gatorades left.

There is nothing really for me to do. I wasn’t in the accident and God knows there are plenty of other witnesses. I decide I should get out of the way. I go up to the young man who initially made the drunk get out of his car; I leave the Gatorade with him; I walk back toward my car. I say goodbye to the old lady and her daughter and I drive away.

I can feel the reaction settling in on myself as my own adrenaline starts to drain away. Turn right, turn right again, fifteen minutes to home. I look down and see my hot chocolate. I pick it up and it is still hot. So little time for lives to be changed.

I sip my hot chocolate and I remember the wide eyes of the woman behind me as she saw inevitability in her rearview mirror. I remember the old lady’s shortness of breath. I can hear the boy’s screams. But then...

How do you remember things you didn’t notice when you were living them? But now I see with total clarity the circle of space we put around the drunk, the pariah. I can see him turning from one of us to the other and none of us would look at him and I can see his frightened smile trembling because he knows he’s screwed up irrevocably and that his life is about to get very much worse and he doesn’t know how to say he’s sorry or express the sick panic in the pit of his stomach. I can see him about to turn to me and I see again my field of vision shifting as I automatically turn away so that when he does turn to me my eyes won’t be there for him to catch. I can see him sitting alone on the grass staring across the grass at nothing in particular and I can see – I can see, I watched people step away from the child and his parents to go back to their cars and I watched them swing fifteen feet out of the straight line of their path in order to avoid coming inside the shunning circle, and it didn’t register then what I was watching but I can see it now as if they were leaving vivid glowing footsteps in their arcing path. I can see myself swinging out on that same path to go offer Gatorade to the boy’s parents, without even thinking about what I was doing. I can see him sitting alone under the hot sun and I have two spare Gatorades and I give them to a man who doesn’t even want them and I walk off without ever saying a word to the drunk on his lonely little patch of grass.

Then he will say to those on his left, “Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.”

They also will answer, “Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?”

He will reply, “I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.”


The loneliest man in Houston sat a few feet away from me. Forty days of Lent and it never even occurred to me to offer him a smile and comfort and a simple drink of Gatorade under the hot sun. On Good Friday.

I can feel tears of shame on my face as I drive. I could go back. I should go back. But I’m halfway home.

I take a sip of hot chocolate.

I keep driving. I do not go back.

God, be merciful to me, a sinner...

Friday, May 30, 2008

Have been finding Robert Herrick helpful

(Kenny)

When you're going through one of life's brutal patches, you might find Robert Herrick's "His Savior's Words, Going to the Cross" helpful, or at least the last two stanzas, which run:

For Christ, your loving Savior, hath
Drunk up the wine of God's fierce wrath;
Only, there's left a little froth,

Less for to taste, than for to shew
What bitter cups had been your due,
Had He not drank them up for you.


I find it extraordinarily helpful to remind myself that, whatever I suffer in the way of malice and calumny, "It's just the froth on the cup."

Here's the whole poem ("transgression" in the second stanza is pronounced roughly "transgres-see-own"):

His Savior's Words, Going to the Cross

Have, have ye no regard, all ye
Who pass this way, to pity me
Who am a man of misery?

A man both bruis'd, and broke, and one
Who suffers not here for mine own
But for my friends' transgression?

Ah! Sion's daughters, do not fear
The Cross, the Cords, the Nails, the Spear,
The Myrrh, the Gall, the Vinegar,

For Christ, your loving Savior, hath
Drunk up the wine of God's fierce wrath;
Only, there's left a little froth,

Less for to taste, than for to shew
What bitter cups had been your due,
Had He not drank them up for you.

Thursday, May 29, 2008

Some visual background for the walking-on-water retelling

(Kenny)

Upon reading the first version of my retelling of Jesus' walking on water, R.I. insisted that I just couldn't leave out the wildflowers that fill every field in Galilee in springtime (that's one of the things I went back and fixed, as best I could).

Then he sent me these arguments (a picture is worth, etc.) to back up his point.




I don't think even the revised version does the wildflowers justice.

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

Dies Irae

(Kenny, with major assist from R.I.)

I liked this enormously. R.I. tells me I need to go buy this version of Verdi's Requiem Mass, which incorporates the poem "Dies Irae," which he sent to me earlier today.

My level of cultural sophistication may be inferred from the fact that I only recognized the last two lines -- and in my best Pavlovian manner thwacked myself on the forehead in between them. (Monty Python, Holy Grail, the chanting monks.)

One mark of the skilled poet, by the way: the trochaic tetrameter never varies until the final two lines, each of are catalectic -- that is, they each come up a syllable short, forcing the reader to feel a strong pause, as the poem dies away. Or, alternatively, the reader could supply the missing final syllable in each line nonverbally...say, by thwacking himself on the forehead:

...pie Jesu Domine (thwack)
dona eis requiem (thwack).


(Does it make the Python parody funnier to know that the self-chastisement is thrown in amidst lines that mean, roughly, "Compassionate Lord Jesus [thwack], grant them rest [thwack]"? I think so, but maybe that's just me.)

And of course the rhyme scheme is a steady stream of three-line rhyming stanzas until suddenly at the end you get a six-line stanza that you could divide into two three-line sentences grammatically, or else you can treat the first four lines as two rhyming couplets, and in either case you end with the two short lines that don't rhyme at all. Furthermore the sense shifts away from the individual's prayer for himself, to a wider perspective embracing all humanity (I may not have the translation exactly right because my medieval Latin is very rusty indeed):

"I pray, kneeling, supplicant,
my heart broken like ashes;
care for me in my final hour.

O, that day of tears
on which man will rise from the dust
to face the judgment!
Therefore spare him, O God:
Compassionate Lord Jesus,
give them rest.

Amen."

A very nice way of signaling that the poem is in its final stages, of slowing the reader down and bringing him gracefully to a stop just in time for the final Amen. And made to order for a composer who is setting the piece to music; the poem itself comes with a ready-made coda, so to speak. Can't wait to see what Verdi does with it.

But my favorite stanza, by a very wide margin, is this one, which (unless my translation is way off, admittedly a definite possibility) captures in twenty-four syllables the Christian's entire defense before the throne of judgment:

Quaerens me, sedisti lassus:
redemisti Crucem passus:
tantus labor non sit cassus.


"In seeking me, you exhausted yourself [lit. "seeking me, you sat exhausted"];
suffering the Cross, you redeemed me --
let not so great a labor be in vain."

That is to say, it's not that I deserve saving -- it's that Jesus' sacrifice demands great honor, and for me to be left unsaved would dishonor His sacrifice.

Anyway, here's the poem:

Dies irae, dies illa
solvet saeclum in favilla:
teste David cum Sibylla.

Quantus tremor est futurus,
quando judex est venturus,
cuncta stricte discussurus!

Tuba mirum spargens sonum
per sepulcra regionum,
coget omnes ante thronum.

Mors stupebit et natura,
cum resurget creatura,
judicanti responsura.

Liber scriptus proferetur,
in quo totum continetur,
unde mundus judicetur.

Judex ergo cum sedebit,
quidquid latet apparebit:
nil inultum remanebit.

Quid sum miser tunc dicturus?
Quem patronum rogaturus,
cum vix justus sit securus?

Rex tremendae majestatis,
qui salvandos salvas gratis,
salva me fons pietatis.

Recordare, Jesu pie,
quod sum causa tuae viae:
ne me perdas illa die.

Quaerens me, sedisti lassus:
redemisti Crucem passus:
tantus labor non sit cassus.

Juste judex ultionis,
donum fac remissionis
ante diem rationis.

Ingemisco, tamquam reus:
culpa rubet vultus meus:
supplicanti parce, Deus.

Qui Mariam absolvisti,
et latronem exaudisti,
mihi quoque spem dedisti.

Preces meae non sunt dignae:
sed tu bonus fac benigne,
ne perenni cremer igne.

Inter oves locum praesta,
et ab haedis me sequestra,
statuens in parte dextra.

Confutatis maledictis,
flammis acribus addictis:
voca me cum benedictis.

Oro supplex et acclinis,
cor contritum quasi cinis:
gere curam mei finis.

Lacrimosa dies illa,
qua resurget ex favilla
judicandus homo reus.
Huic ergo parce, Deus:
pie Jesu Domine,
dona eis requiem.

Amen.

Sunday, May 25, 2008

A Gospel story retold: Jesus walks on the water

(Kenny)

He needed to get away.

It had been inevitable, of course; in a sense his cousin John had committed a particularly lingering form of suicide the day he decided to attack Herodias publicly. But, still, John hadn't thought he was signing up for his own death. John had had faith that Jesus was the Messiah; he had had faith that Jesus would overthrow the detestable regime that John was attacking and would usher in the new age of David's throne, and so John had preached his sermons with what he thought was impunity. It had not been long ago that a messenger had come to Jesus, with a message that made it clear that John had started to fear that Jesus was going to dawdle around too long, and that he, John, was in sore danger of becoming one of Herod's last victims. Finally, just moments ago, Jesus had heard the news that had long been inevitable.

If only John had understood what "the coming of the Kingdom" really meant. It had been no part of the Father's plan -- it had never been part of the Father's plan -- that Jesus would save John from execution. Jesus was not even going to save himself, when the time came. But there had been no way to make John understand.

And now John was dead.

He needed to get away.

"Peter," he called softly. Peter scrambled clumsily to his feet. "Yes, Rabbi?"

"Get the boat ready. We're going to go along the coast to the hills so we can get away from the crowds for awhile. I need some time alone. "

One thing about Peter, he chuckled to himself: one never had to say, "Come on, Peter, hurry it up, would you?" Neither planning nor prudence was the big man's forté, but no one would ever accuse him of laziness or lack of initiative. Besides (and Jesus' face grew grave), Peter had been worried about his rabbi for a while now, as Jesus well knew. Peter thought Jesus was overworked...and Jesus knew that his headstrong follower was, in this case, quite right.

He needed to get away.

The little band habitually traveled light, and in short order they were clambering into the boat. But they were being watched, as always -- the comings and goings and doings of Jesus of Nazareth were by far the most fascinating subject of public discussion in all of Galilee. Before the oars could even begin their rising and falling, a crowd was gathering: "Jesus, where are you going?"

He didn't answer, except with a vague, "I have to leave for a little while; I have other places to go." They would have to be satisfied with that...except, of course, they weren't. The boat began to move away from the shore, but the calls and questions followed; and the crowd on the shore was growing, as the rumor flashed through Capernaum: "The Prophet is sailing away, and he won't tell us where he's going."

They rowed out further, forty yards or so from shore. In a moment they would turn to head slightly south of west in the bright morning, headed for open country and deserted hills well out past the villages where Jesus had been ministering. But already, as Jesus gazed back at the crowd, watching its numbers swell, he could see his hopes of silence and solitude and regeneration wavering and dissipating like morning fog.

The boat turned west.

It was, of course, the boys who were first to race west along the shoreline, though the young men were not far behind. Here was a game indeed: who would be the first to figure out where the Prophet was headed? The mass of people on the shore wavered and then changed shape and started to become a long line, like a snake writhing its way down the shore: first the boys, then the rest of the crowd -- younger men, fathers with children on their shoulders and wives in their wake, here and there an old man riding donkey-back. The excited back-and-forth calls of the younger boys in the van played a high-pitched descant above a lower, pianissimo rumble from the bulk of the throng, in accordance with a reasonable division of labor: it was the job of the boys to run ahead and shout back up-to-the-minute news of what the boat was actually doing, whereas the job of each adult was, first, to make a guess about where Jesus intended to land, and then to explain to his neighbor why his own shrewd guess was clearly superior to said neighbor's foolish and groundless speculation.

The crowd, especially the boys, was simply too raucous and distracting; he needed peace and quiet. "Move a little further from the shore." Obediently the disciples put some more water between Jesus and the crowd; and now the calls of the boys came to his ears with the peculiar clarity of sound echoing across a calm, peaceful lake, shrunken in volume but still perfectly clear, like a Greek miniature carved by a master artist where every detail is perfect but the scale is a tenth of real life.

They rowed past the first cluster of houses west of Capernaum, and he shook his head with mingled frustration and compassion. The boys sprinted delightedly into the tiny fishing settlement, each eager to be the first to proclaim the news: "Jesus is sailing toward Gennesaret; we're going to figure out exactly where he's headed." Door after door of house after house burst open, and as the settlement fell leisurely astern he could see that the long caravan of the curious and the excited had swollen, not shrunk.

For perhaps a half-hour longer they rowed, a gentle eastern breeze beginning to stir at their backs, and he could tell that the excitement along the shore was building rather than dying down. Even when trees and underbrush forced the crowd temporarily inland and out of his direct view, he had no doubt that they were keeping pace inexorably; and sure enough as the boat approached every headland that extended into the lake there were pointing and dancing youngsters who had run on ahead. He sighed as he realized that among the young men there no doubt were a few self-appointed heralds hot-footing it ahead of him on down to the settlements further south and west with the news of his approach, stirring up villages he hadn't even reached yet -- that, in fact, the longer the disciples might row, the larger the crowds would grow.

"Enough," he said. "We'll put in over there at the Seven Springs, where all that soft grass is."

They altered course to bear shoreward, and across the water they heard the boys' cheers of glee at the change in direction, and then a growing rumble as the men and families in the boys' wake picked up the pace. As the shore drew near and there ceased to be any question of where they intended to land, the crowds spilled over the last ridge of the last headland before the hillside of the Seven Springs and fanned out across the curving shoreline; so that by the time he landed he was already surrounded by a roiling, festively boisterous assembly of onlookers.

Peter and the other disciples were openly glowering; but Jesus greeted the crowds with gentleness and cheerfulness. With a sigh the disciples beached the boat. They knew the drill by now, and before long Jesus was settled on the hillside and the disciples were back at their stations, directing traffic, settling the crowds...and then Jesus began to teach.

The hours went by, and the sun began to sink, and still Jesus taught. Philip could see the thunder beginning to gather on James's brow, and he grumbled to James, "How long does he intend to teach these people? I thought he was supposed to be taking a day off."

"Yeah, and when are we going to eat? I'm hungry."

The ever-present undertone of sotto voce neighbor-to-neighbor running commentary from the crowd suddenly swelled into the dull roar of two thousand full-voiced conversations as Jesus paused for a short breather, sitting quietly alone on the hillside. Philip got to his feet. "I'm going to talk to him. He needs to send these people home for their dinners."

He walked up to Jesus, who turned his head toward him with a weary smile. "Rabbi, it's getting late, and there are all these people out here, and I'm sure they're hungry..."

Jesus interrupted, his air one of innocently bland gravity. "I'm glad you mentioned that, Philip; I was just wondering myself, actually -- what are you disciples going to do about feeding all these people?"

The disciples stared at each other, dumbfounded. James was the first to find his voice: "Rabbi, just tell them to go find a village and buy themselves some food!" Then he flushed, recollecting that Jesus had after all gone to rather a lot of trouble precisely in order to get to a place where there weren't any villages handy...and besides, anybody who lived in any village within half a day's walk, had spent his day working up an appetite by listening to Jesus, not making bread to sell to other people.

Jesus looked at them, still carefully straight-faced. "No. No, I have a better idea: you feed them."

Philip couldn't believe his ears. "Rabbi, you gotta be kidding -- you could spend half a year's income buying bread and you wouldn't feed all of these people."

Jesus allowed himself the smallest of smiles. "Go ahead, Philip; that's you disciples' job tonight: get these people fed."

The disciples looked at each other in astonishment, then huddled together to brainstorm. It was Peter who suggested, "Do you think maybe any of these people brought some food with them?" and, naturally without waiting for any response, he turned to the crowd and began asking, "Does anybody have any food?" The other disciples, having no better ideas of their own, fanned out into the crowd as well, but over and over came the same few answers: "No, sorry, we didn't have time to pack anything." "No, sorry, we didn't realize he was going to go this far down the lake." "No, sorry, can't help."

He watched them quietly, that same small smile still on his face. Then there was a bit of a commotion around Andrew, and after a few moments the disciples turned and headed back toward Jesus. A little boy was with Andrew, and he had a small wicker basket in his hand, a little basket that must have come conveniently to hand to a foresighted housewife pausing to collect a small lunch for her family as they harried her out of the house and onto the road. They came up to Jesus, did Andrew and the boy and the other disciples, all of them (except the boy) the very picture of confusion and discouragement.

"Rabbi," began Andrew, "this little boy here has a couple of fish and a few loaves of bread, but I don't see what good that's going to do with all these people..."

Jesus rose decisively to his feet. He spoke just as calmly and quietly as a few moments earlier, yet somehow now the familiar steel tone of irresistible authority rang in his voice, that clarion trumpet-note of power that no voice but his possessed, firing their spirits and setting their pulses throbbing with anticipation of they knew not what: "Tell the people to sit down on the grass."

Five decades later, looking back, John could remember the lushness of that thick, green spring-fed grass shot through with a joyous welter of crimson and golden and sky-blue wildflowers, flourishing in the few brief weeks before the summer sun would beat down upon the fields and bake everything brown. Peter would tell the story in later years as well, in his case as he chatted with John Mark amid the chaos and noise and stench that was Imperial Rome. And the orderly pattern formed by blocks of earthy brown and tan homespun peasant clothing, set in dull contrast against the glorious riot of that grass and those flowers, would be still so vivid in Peter's mind that he would tell Mark, "He had us organize the people on the grass in flowerbeds, fifty and a hundred people at a time" -- as if Jesus had been spading up plots in a garden, not seating a crowd.

Even as Jesus stood and the disciples gestured for silence, there was an unmistakable buzz in the crowd, for was this not the Prophet? Whatever he was planning to do, was it not likely to be a story they could tell over and over again to their children and their children's children? Then Jesus raised the bread and fish in his hands, and for the first time all day utter silence fell, as five thousand and more held their breath in expectation. He addressed his Father, his voice weighty as gold, clear as summer dawn; he broke the bread; he gave it to his disciples and ordered them, "Pass it out to the people..."

A couple of hours later, as the disciples gathered up twelve baskets of leftovers from the five loaves and the two fish, Jesus sat on the hillside looking out over the crowd and thinking about his problem -- and a very serious problem it was. He had long ago come to accept the fact that other than himself nobody, not even his cousin John the Baptist, could understand what it was truly going to mean to be God's Anointed. He had from the very earliest days of his ministry seen that the temptation to empire that he had rejected in the wilderness, was a temptation that would be constantly thrust upon him from every side, simply because the common people of Israel were desperate for just such a Messiah as John had expected, and as Satan had offered to make of Jesus. This burden, he wore with the ease of long custom.

But there was a new and ugly feel to the crowd this evening. John the Baptist had grown tired of waiting; but John had been in prison and could do no worse than send hurt and sarcastically rebuking questions. Now, however, he could hear in the tone of the crowd -- he could feel in the very air -- that of the five thousand men on that hillside, a sizable number had also grown tired of waiting for Jesus to act, and were beginning to talk of forcing his hand. And these were five thousand men, not one, and they were out roaming free, not confined to a prison. Nor did they have the slightest intention of allowing him to escape; he had already tried that this morning, and they would be far more fanatically watchful now.

Yes, he certainly had a problem.

But he also had a plan.

The disciples had finished with the baskets and stacked them all together on the shore. Wearily they trudged up the hill toward him. He rose and went to meet them, in the shadow cast by the hill on which they had spent the afternoon.

To their credit, they did not rebel when they heard their part of his plan, the plan that involved their turning back around, climbing into their boat, and striking out for the northeastern shore five miles away, rather than going to an early and well-deserved bed. "I'll stay here and dismiss the crowds; you go on ahead, and after I've sent the crowds away I'm going to go pray. I'll find you later."

They had not been happy, though, especially because he could see the questions none of them put into words: how long will it be before we see him again? and how are we supposed to know when to come back and get him? or where will he catch a ride across the lake if we're not supposed to come back for him? And though none of them mentioned it, they all knew, standing there on the hillside above the shore, that the pleasant eastern breeze of the morning was strengthening, and that crossing the lake now meant a stiff five-mile pull at the oars into an obstinate headwind, and that at the end of a long and tiring day. But he was their rabbi, and so they got in their boat, under the curious gaze of the crowd, and wearily began to toil their way toward the far shore.

He stood and watched for a moment, then turned to the crowd. He blessed them there in the deepening dusk, then said firmly, "I must be alone to pray. I am going up to the top of the mountain. You must allow me to be alone."

He knew that they would not follow. But he also knew that they would not leave, not all of them. He knew without looking that they were taking up stations, each man and boy making a guess about where Jesus might be headed next, and each finding a post where he could watch the road or path he thought Jesus most likely to take. He knew that many of them expected him to head for the other shore to meet up with the Twelve, and therefore that every fishing village and boat between Gennesaret and Capernaum would be closely watched.

And he would have congratulated this latter group on their perspicacity, in at least one respect: they were quite right that he intended to cross the Sea and meet back up with the Twelve.

He just wasn't going to use a boat.

He chuckled to himself as he topped the summit of the hill, and then, with unspeakable relief at having finally found the solitude he had so longed for, he entered into communion with his Father.

It was well after midnight when he rose to his feet. The moon rode high in the sky and the steady eastern wind swept the dark hair back from his face as he walked calmly down the hill. The trampled grass now lay empty in the ghostly moonlight; most of the crowd had gone home or fallen asleep, and those who still watched were watching the roads, not the empty shore. Confidently he strode across the grass, and then across the white rocks at the water's edge, and then out onto the sea itself.

He wanted to be at the other side before the first pre-dawn stirrings of the fisherfolk. The hunt would be on again soon, and he wanted to have some rest time before he was found. He strode across the water with the long, deceptively easy, ground-devouring stride of the lifelong country dweller, the wind in his face, the three-foot whitecaps sinking respectfully ahead of him to ease his path. He mused to himself that the Twelve were no doubt having a rough time of it -- he knew they had already been tired when they set out, and rowing into a headwind was no picnic even when one was fresh. It was not part of his plan to raise inconvenient questions by arriving at the eastern shore in a boat that had left the western shore without him, but still, he planned to check on them en route.

He was still quite some distance from landfall when he caught sight of the boat ahead of him in the moonlight.

He shook his head in sympathy as he drew near them, unnoticed in the night despite the full moonlight. He could see from the very movements of the rowers that they had reached that stage of exhaustion in which one strains at the oars with wasted and inefficient motion because one is too tired to muster the form and leverage that make a boat leap eagerly forward at one's every stroke. Still, they had spent their lives as fishermen, and tired as they were, and slow as their progress was, his critical eye judged that they were going to be fine. And he was running out of time; he needed to reach the other shore. He smiled to himself and lengthened his stride as he started to move on past them, bearing some twenty or thirty yards to their left, and then he saw Thomas's head turn in his direction.

He started to raise his hand to give Thomas a friendly wave, but before his hand could rise above his waist, the oar had fallen from Thomas's hand, and the wind carried across the waves Thomas's shriek of pure terror. A moment later every oar was abandoned and every eye fixed in horror on Jesus, and above all the outcry rose Judas's piercing tenor: "A ghost! God save us all, a ghost!"

Ah, well, it was an understandable reaction, after all. He held up his hands in reassurance and called to them, "No, no, it's me -- don't be afraid, it's me, Jesus. I'm not a ghost." He changed course and took a couple of steps toward the boat, drawing near enough to make out their faces in the full moonlight, then paused to take stock of their emotional state.

They fell mostly silent, though their expressions still betrayed terror and confusion. He could hear Thomas and Peter arguing vehemently, though, both talking at once and at speed; and he realized that Peter, bless his heart, was already convinced that it was really Jesus -- but Thomas was having none of it; everyone knew water wouldn't hold the weight of a living man. A moment later Jesus laughed out loud in purest delight as he realized that Peter had leaped to exactly the sort of practical refutation that would of course have occurred to Peter, even though it would never have occurred to a single other person in the whole wide world. "Well, you don't think I'm a ghost, do you?" demanded Peter of Thomas, and then without waiting for an answer he swung around and called to Jesus:

"Rabbi, if it's really you, why don't you command me to come out there with you?"

Merriment danced in Jesus' voice: "Certainly, Peter, come on out."

And sure enough, Peter hopped out of the boat, just as Jesus had known he would -- and Jesus now began to stride swiftly toward Peter, since he also knew that after the first moment of impetuosity had passed, it would sink in on Peter that Thomas did, after all, have rather a point about the whole water-holding-the-weight-of-living-men bit. Peter took one step, then two, then a third...and then Jesus saw self-awareness dawning on Peter's face, saw the moment when Peter's eyes flickered to one side and widened at the sight of the whitecaps, saw Peter start to pitch forward as at his next step his foot was seized by the suddenly ravenous and heaving water -- and then Jesus caught Peter's wrist as Peter fell.

He pulled Peter up beside him, the corners of his mouth twitching. "Peter...only three steps?" he teased his abashed, and still wide-eyed, disciple affectionately. "Why did you run out of faith so fast? What made you start doubting?"

He looked at the disciples in the boat, and he looked at the shore shadowy in the distance, still a mile or so off. There wasn't much time, but after all of this it was obvious that they would be in no shape to function if he were simply to drop Peter off at the boat and then walk on. A silent consultation with his Father, and then after helping Peter back into the boat, he climbed in himself: his Father had agreed; the disciples could hitch a ride with Jesus. And so, as he eased himself over the gunwhale, the wind sighed away into nothingness, like an exhausted, already half-asleep man sinking into a soft bed at the end of a long day.

He patted Thomas on the shoulder.

They searched for words. "Rabbi...you...you really are the Son of the Most High..."

He smiled. "Let's get to shore."

The sea lay ahead of them like glass. They scrambled to the oars, and at the first stroke the boat leaped forward like a dolphin at play, rushing toward the shore like a lover at day's end who sees his beloved waiting on the threshold with open arms and eager eyes. They were there, almost as quickly as thought. They beached the boat.

"And now," said the Son of God, "I think we could all use some sleep."

-------------

Author's notes may be found here, if you're curious about the degree to which this retelling has a factual basis.

Notes on "A Gospel story retold"

(Kenny)

Just a few explanatory notes on the retelling of Jesus' walking on water that follows in the next post...

Let me first say that the first couple of versions of this piece received some trenchant and extremely useful criticisms from Reliquiae Israhel, my esteemed co-blogger, at whose urging I wrote the piece to begin with. Each of those criticisms resulted in at least one revision, greatly (I think) improving the historical accuracy and artistic impact of the piece.

Now, here's the thing about reading the Gospels: you ought to be reading them as if they were movie scripts, not as if they were novels. The gospel writers were mostly writing down what they would have said if they were telling to story to a live audience. Not only did they not know anything about how a modern writer of narrative (either fictional or journalistic) communicates in print such things as tones of voice and gestures and emotions, but even if they had, they did not have at their disposal the typographical conventions necessary to capture them on paper. So you have to fill in these details yourself, as best you can, from your own imagination -- the way you have to do when you're reading a play or a movie script. (When you're watching the play, of course, the actor gives you all of that, and when you're reading a novel, the author spells it out for you; but when you're reading the script -- or one of the Gospels -- you're on your own.)

So in Sunday School class this morning we happened to read the story of how Jesus walked on the water, and I came away thinking it would be fun and edifying to retell that story. Which I did, and the result of which you can find here.

There are a couple of things I need to explain to people wanting to know how far my retelling is based on actual fact. First of all, you need to read all three versions: Matthew's, Mark's and John's. John supplies the crucial information that Jesus and the crowds were playing a deadly serious game of cat-and-mouse, thus allowing us to understand that Jesus' motive in choosing to walk across the sea at night instead of riding in the boat with the disciples was an entirely pragmatic and strategic one, and had nothing to do with showing off or (at least as its main motive) improving the disciples' faith.

Mark, on the other hand, tosses in the off-hand, but fascinating, remark that Jesus apparently had every intention of keeping right on going. He seems to have sort of swung by to make sure the disciples were okay; but until they flipped out into a full-scale panic attack on him, Jesus -- according to Mark -- intended to walk right on past them.

This leads to a third point that I think is very often misunderstood. This miracle didn't take place in the middle of a storm. The reason Jesus intended to walk right on by and leave the disciples straining at their oars is simple: they weren't in any trouble. Sure, they were having to work hard; but having to work hard is not at all the same thing as being in danger.

I think people get confused on this point by a lack of personal experience in rowing boats across lakes, and by assumptions that bleed in from a different miracle. It's hard not to conflate this episode with the earlier episode in which Jesus calmed the storm. And so the image that I had as a boy and that I think most of my fellow Christians have, is the image of Jesus walking calmly across the water in the middle of a raging storm. In fact it's much simpler: Jesus is simply walking, and the disciples are simply rowing, into the face of an annoyingly inconvenient headwind. This is why the disciples are making very slow progress; it's also the reason Jesus is making much better time than they are. Those of us who have experience in paddling a canoe or rowing a small boat across a lake when a breeze picks up in our faces, can tell you two things: (1) You can walk into a headwind way faster than you can row into it. (Though, admittedly, one is normally walking on land.) (2) It's extremely frustrating to row into a headwind because you yourself become your own sail. You can't, that is, lie flat and still paddle, because you can't get any leverage...but the moment you sit up straight and put your back into your paddling, the wind catches hold of you and in effect your back (with the wind) pushes you the wrong way as fast as your arms (with the water) can propel you the right way.

One last point. The more years I put in as a father myself, the more amusement, and the less anger, I seem to hear in Jesus' voice as he talks to his silly, confused, bumbling disciples. I find myself more and more reading lines that, as a child, I heard Jesus say (in my imagination) with a sharp edge to his tongue, but now realizing that in a similar situation I'd probably say pretty much the same words Jesus says to the disciples...except that I'd be affectionately teasing my children. I mean, the point would be serious and I would certainly want them to pay attention and get the point; but I find that in such circumstances I am rather more often chuckling to myself about the foibles of the young, not honked off and blasting away at them. "O ye of little faith, why did ye doubt?" "Silly child, did you really think I didn't already know about that?" Perhaps I'm wrong in this; but that's the way it "plays" best when I try to imagine the scene as it actually happened.